RESUMO
The Copenhagen Centre for Regulatory Science (CORS) and Biopeople at the University of Copenhagen held a workshop in May 2015 titled "Patient Involvement in Medicines Development and Approvals: A Paradigm Shift Towards True Patient Impact in Medicines Development and Regulatory Science" that acknowledged the importance of having patients more involved in the entire process of medicines research and development (R&D) and life cycle management. Four key stakeholders, representing patients, academia, industry, and regulatory authorities, each gave their view and perspective on the status and challenges of current patient involvement. From the 3 breakout sessions, it was concluded that patient-reported outcomes (ie, the report of the status of a patient's health condition that comes directly from the patient, without interpretation of the patient's response by a clinician or anyone else), was considered as an important tool when deciding endpoints. It was agreed that professionalization of the patient within medicine R&D to some extent would be necessary for obtaining influence. However, the industry should also seek to accommodate to the patient instead of waiting passively for patients to become educated. A much better organized and stronger involvement of patients was called for. However, this should not only rely on goodwill, but should preferably be implemented by legal requirements, so as to secure compliance by all stakeholders. An independent platform with the purpose of providing access to patient experience was proposed. A research and educational center such as CORS, which was founded on cross-sectorial and cross-disciplinary cooperation, is an example of an institution that could be a good starting point for hosting such a platform.
RESUMO
We present a commentary on the international aspects of the evolution of regulatory science as a multidisciplinary, multistakeholder academic discipline of education and applied research emphasizing the need for seamless interaction between stakeholders such as regulatory authorities, the pharmaceutical industry, universities, payers, and patient organizations. Regulatory science is the science of developing new tools, standards, and approaches to evaluate the efficacy, safety, quality, and performance of medical products in order to assess benefit/risk and facilitate a sound and transparent regulatory decision making throughout development and life cycle management.
RESUMO
A fixed-dose combination (FDC) is a drug product in which two or more separate drug components (active pharmaceutical ingredients) are combined in a single-dosage form. Interest in developing FDCs is increasing in a range of diseases. This project investigated the regulatory environment for FDCs in the EU and US. A review of the FDC guidelines set forth by the EMA, FDA, and ICH, followed by interviews of key informants in industry, identified 5 main industry concerns related to development of FDCs. These concerns were presented to key informants from both the EU and US regulatory authorities. It was clear from the results that the current regulatory environment for FDCs lacks consistency. This may create a barrier to innovation moving from the laboratory to the clinic, as companies cannot clearly see the development path requirements. This project also highlighted certain challenges that currently face the regulatory world: how to improve the role of regulatory science and provide clear quantification in assessment decisions; the role of guidelines and their impact on innovation; and, most important, the question of globalization and how to move toward a more harmonized regulatory system.
